H v B & others
Acting for 3 investors allegedly defrauded of US$ 35 million in their claims against one of the world’s biggest banks in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, reported as one of ‘the trials of 2007’.
S v H & Ors
Acting for an alleged de facto director in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, in the defence of a claim brought by the liquidators of S (Grant Thornton); these claims involved allegations of diverting in excess of £30 million tax by utilising 1000 personal service companies. The litigation was compromised on confidential terms.
Revenue & Customs Prosecution Office v B
Representing a director of two companies charged with a substantial VAT fraud involving land sales. The criminal proceedings continue in the Crown Court at Reading. Restraint proceedings (Involving Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the Criminal Justice Act 1988) having been challenged on his behalf in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court.
D v B
Representing D, a Saudi based financial services company against a US aerospace manufacturer in relation to a transaction involving a purchase of a private jet and claims of bribery. We secured a seven figure out of court settlement in February 2007.
D v J
Instructed in relation to a commercial property dispute where it is alleged that J defrauded our client out of £4m in relation to a Mayfair property development.
Assets Recovery Agency v C
Following the securing of his acquittal of an alleged £35 million VAT conspiracy; compromising civil confiscation proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, which enabled our client to acquire three properties by utilising the conviction of a co-accused under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
|
S v R
Acting in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, on behalf of a $350 million bankrupt; the case involved the appeal by his Trustees in Bankruptcy to suspend his automatic discharge from bankruptcy.
Assets Recovery Agency –v- S
Defending a solicitor in one of the biggest civil claims being conducted by ARA. The litigation was reported in a National newspaper and described by the Director of the Assets Recovery Agency at the time as ‘trench warfare’. ARA had brought proceedings for the recovery of a £19 million property portfolio pursuant to its civil recovery powers under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
S v R
In Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court successfully resisting multi-million dollar claim by a New York bank in relation to a guarantee.
DTI v D
Secured leave to continue to act as a director in the Companies Court for director disqualified pursuant to the Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
S v B
Acted against liquidator and trustee in bankruptcy to secure substantial settlement in Chancery Division of High Court. Case involved alleged breaches of a Mareva injunction, the efficacy of a solicitor’s lien and a creditor’s right of set-off under the Insolvency Act 1986.
|